This caused him peter the great be frequently embarrassed. In conclusion, all three of these absolute monarchs could change their whole country drastically because of their power. In Versailles, Louis XIV builds a beautiful, and grand capital where nobles would gather to pamper the monarch.
He thought that France did non necessitate to purchase things from other states by doing settlements of its ain. This caused him to be often embarrassed. Unlike Louis, Peter the Great had to catch up to the west, so he traveled to the European powers and copied their army, type of government, and navy.
Louis spent this money on his wars. People who hated Mazarin involved in riots that destroyed and divided France. In the idea of absolutism, monarchs would grow increasingly powerful while exercising their divine right.
He modeled other states and took their thoughts. Another rational gift was his positions on authorities: Peter the Great uses nobles for his busy seaport whereas Louis XIV weakened the nobles and made them feel inferior because even the luckiest noble would only tuck him into sleep.
A manner that helped Peter catch up to the West was when he changed the capital to St. He thought that France did not need to buy things from other countries by making colonies of its own.
This allowed Peter to be closer to the west.
An example of his tolerance and restraint was when he allowed freedom of religion. Finally, Frederick the Great, the enlightened despot, was different from the other two monarchs because he had many intellectual gifts such as tolerance and restraint.
Peter traveled to the West in order to larn about other civilisations because Russia was behind in about every facet. Louis Fourteen increased his gross by taxing. Louis XIV and Peter the Great served as great absolute monarchies that left a heavy impact on their states.
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Finally, Frederick the Great, the enlightened despot, was full of tolerance and restraint and had good views on government.
He also reclaimed wastelands, built canals and improved industries. French society despised Mazarin for strengthening the central government and increasing taxes.
Colbert improved trade and commercialism utilizing the mercantile system.
More essays like this: Society becomes eager for a change, and the change would come in the form of an absolute monarch.Peter the Great and Louis the XIV were some of the best rulers of their time. They both ruled in a similar method.
Peter the Great was one of the best Tsars Russia has ever seen by brining in the. Dec 19, · Compare and contrast the methods of Louis XIV and Peter the Great. December 19, euphoricl0ner Leave a comment In the 17th century, the idea of.
Start studying Louis XIV Peter the Great. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. AP Euro Essay Compare and contrast the reign of Peter the Great of Russia and Louis XIV of France.
STUDY. PLAY. Intro: Peter the Great of Russia and Louis XIV of France - Peter learned from Western Europe - Louis made France successful in Europe because of advanced economy and political system.
Essay on 3 absolute monarchs: Louis XIV, Peter the Great, Frederick the Great Essay by rt, Junior High, 8th grade, B, February download word file, 3 pages download word file, 3 pages 1 votes3/5(1).
Louis XIV, the sun king, built a splendid court at Versailles where he looked over the nobles. Peter the Great, the westernizer, changed Russia from a backward country into a great power. Finally, Frederick the Great, the enlightened despot, was full of tolerance and restraint and had good views on government.Download